History Talk History Talk    FAQ   Search   Memberlist   Usergroups   Register   Profile   Log in to check your private messages   Log in  #12 Archimedes Plutonium on front cover of Argus Leader news Goto page Previous  1, 2          History Talk Forum Index -> History Talk View previous topic :: View next topic   Author Message Active Member Guest Posted: Mon Jun 30, 2008 11:52 pm    Post subject: Re: #17 fascinated by hecklers and their psychological imbal #17 "Archimedes Plutonium" anagram - "Manure-mouth Disciple" <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> wrote in message news:d7fd718b-140d-494f-b319-e84254848b33@l42g2000hsc.googlegroups.com... Quote: Active Member wrote: Back to top   Ads Advertising Sponsor Active Member Guest Posted: Mon Jun 30, 2008 11:55 pm    Post subject: Re: #16 egregious newspaper reporter error "homemade cape"?; #16 "Archimedes Plutonium" anagram - "Chromium Panties Duel" <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> wrote in message news:73adec7c-ccc1-413f-998a-34ae18780d43@8g2000hse.googlegroups.com... Back to top   Ads Advertising Sponsor Guest Posted: Tue Jul 01, 2008 8:23 am    Post subject: #18 Archimedes Plutonium on front cover of Argus Leader news Cwatters wrote: Quote: plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> wrote in message news:29badbb2-c882-4117-b826-35a1205f59c3@p25g2000hsf.googlegroups.com... Well, it is out there, Archimedes Plutonium on the front page and full feature news article in the South Dakota Argus Leader. Never heard of it. I was on the cover of Wired magazine once - it was equally uncomplimentary. Well I guess you have the same two options open that I have. If not too old of a story, one is to send an email listing the mistakes and hope they take action. And the second is to write a story about the Wired story and post it to the Internet. There is a good chance that more eyes would read your story in sci newsgroups than those people who read it from the magazine itself. I do not know what the laws are regarding the application of correcting a mistake in printed material. Whether they are forced to add the mistakes to a Correction Column such as in the Wall Street Journal. P.S. I wrote a reply to this post earlier, but it disappeared, and excuse it if it shows up later. Archimedes Plutonium www.iw.net/~a_plutonium whole entire Universe is just one big atom where dots of the electron-dot-cloud are galaxies Back to top   Ads Advertising Sponsor Guest Posted: Thu Jul 03, 2008 4:54 pm    Post subject: #19 a code-rule of bringing in outside comments in a story; I suspect there is a code rule in journalism concerning who a editor can bring into a story done on another person. As in the case of the Story done on Archimedes Plutonium on 29 June 2008 by Nestor Ramos of the Argus Leader in Sioux Falls South Dakota. My concern is the injection of Jesse Hughes, some philosopher on the East Coast and why should he take up ample space with negative comments in a story of Archimedes Plutonium. I believe the correct and proper code of conduct rule by a reporter was to tell me that the story would have comments by Jesse Hughes. And upon hearing that, I could have said "do not write the story and goodbye". However, what did happen was that Mr. Ramos said nothing to the fact that he was going to include some outside commentor. So, please correct me if wrong, but I believe there is some code of conduct by journalists or news reporters doing stories on scientists. That the journalist has a duty to inform all the scientists of the story, as to who will have "words of thought or comments" included in the story. And with that information, any of those scientists could say "stop there, for I want nothing to do with this story" If Mr. Ramos had told me he was going to include comments by Jesse Hughes, I would have said, go ahead with the story, but include this statement: "That Mr. Hughes is a sour and bitter philosopher, judging from his Usenet posts and is unqualified to comment on the Atom Totality theory since it is physics, not philosophy" Archimedes Plutonium www.iw.net/~a_plutonium whole entire Universe is just one big atom where dots of the electron-dot-cloud are galaxies Back to top   Ads Advertising Sponsor porky_pig_jr@my-deja.com Guest Posted: Fri Jul 04, 2008 2:19 am    Post subject: Re: #19 a code-rule of bringing in outside comments in a sto On Jul 3, 12:54 pm, plutonium.archime...@gmail.com wrote: My Quote: concern is the injection of Jesse Hughes, some philosopher on the East Coast and why should he take up ample space with negative comments in a story of Archimedes Plutonium. Don't you worry, Archie. No one trusts those East Coast philosophers anyway. Back to top   Ads Advertising Sponsor Display posts from previous: All Posts1 Day7 Days2 Weeks1 Month3 Months6 Months1 Year Oldest FirstNewest First         History Talk Forum Index -> History Talk All times are GMT Goto page Previous  1, 2 Page 2 of 2   Jump to: Select a forum History Talk----------------History Talk  You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum Australian Debt Consolidation Experts medical insurance Wedding Invitation Escort, massaggiatrici e accompagnatrici a Modena, Bologna, Parma, Brescia, Vicenza ... Free Porn PHP Make Your Own Website Cheap Phone Calls Long island Cleaning service toxic mold UK Swingers Genuine Contacts Site Janitorial Supplies Vacuum Bags 130 Attacks blocked Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group